Cock only devices. Any good?

[greecemonkey]

Hi everyone. another nube here.

We're still looking for the right device.

The ones which rely on containing the balls aren't suitable for me as I have a fairly rare condition called cryptorchidism in which, not to put too fine a point on it, the balls constantly retreat back into the body, sometimes for months.

I'm looking, therefore at devices like the Kali ring or Mike's spikes, which can be just worn on the cock and are used to spoil erections rather than cage the little man.

Anyone got any experience of these things that might help the decision makeing process?

Thanks.

[peter_rabbit]

I found Mike's Spikes far too heavy. I do have a Kali's Teeth Bracelet, and that device from MCN is nice and light. It's a pretty serious experience though!

[The Grinder]

We are using a Lori's 5. This device uses a Prince Albert piercing to anchor the tube and tube/shaft friction to hold it in place. It is custom made and needs to be. The tube internal diameter needs to be spot on - too little and you'll get edema, a tube too big slides down onto the piercing and that does hurt.

I find this to be the most comfortable of anything we tried. It wasn't even close. No rubs, no ointments, no hot spot. The jury is still out about long term play.

The device is not intended to be painful and does not prevent partial erections, but you aren't going to get any more satisfaction than that.

Delivery times are slow. That might not matter if you don't already have a PA since the healing time can be longer than delivery time. Bigger piercings are better. I am using a 6ga and likely would be happier with a 4ga.

The Grinder

[greecemonkey]

Many thanks guys. I was getting concerned that I wasn't going to find a suitable piece of kit.

[peter_rabbit]

We ordered a MouseTrap from MaleChastityNow.com (MCN on this board). I'll be getting it soon, and can share the benefit of my experience.

[greecemonkey]

Looking forward to hearing about it.

[lockim1]

I am interested in the Penicap from Lustlock. Very little in the way of reviews. It looks 100% secure and it has been around for quite some time but not much talk about it... gives me pause. I myself am looking for a simplier and smallier device that is light, secure, and prevents masturbation.

[Albert Steel]

I've mentioned this before in a steelworxx-related thread, but I got the Securo Cage last christmas. Was not too big of an investment since I ordered it without the PA lock, already having one from my Looker03. It's shiny and looks great,but it seems - at least for me -that a device only covering the head of the penis is little more than a piece of jewellery, since it still leaves much of the mighty shaft available for play. And so it happened that when trying how secure the Securo Cage is - and I didn't need to try that hard - an accidental explosion occurred. Since then the Cage has been mostly sitting on the shelf.
Reading quite opposite reviews of devices of this style I'm wondering if it's got to do with me having my foreskin intact and maybe they work better for circumcised people. The matter of course is completely subjective..
A bit off the topic but for the sake of comparison;
Wearing the Looker I once tried the vibrator method for a good 10 or 15 minutes but was not able to bring myself to nirvana (different case with the plastic cb that was the first thing I tried) so I'm happy with it's level of security. It's not like I would be actively looking ways to entertain myself anyway when there's a piece of metal hanging around the playfield saying Park Closed for the Season, but for me it would not work if I knew the carousel was still running and there was a hole in the fence just 50 feet off..

[The Grinder]

I think the long version of the LustLock would be effective but I have doubts about the regular one. The piercing pin has a curious shape somewhat different from a curved barbell or captive bead ring. It likely will take some getting used to.

I can't say anything about what works for an intact man. The foreskin is a dense source of sensations - even the tiny bit left on a cut man seems to be the key to getting an orgasm. If the device doesn't cover the 'sweet spot(s)' then I expect it is not going to work very well.

One thing that strikes me about the Securo Cage is how little shaft friction there is to hold the weight of the contraption. It looks ouchy heavy if it ends up hanging mostly on the piercing.

The Grinder

[peter_rabbit]

Looking forward to hearing about it.

I'll write up a full review later, but my wife beckoned me to open the package after I got home from work last night, and she and I installed the MouseTrap I didn't need a third hand, but it helps. Also it was sweet and wonderful that my first wearing was with her 100% cooperation. As I said, this is the first device she's had full participation in choosing out and ordering. So it's special to me.

The MouseTrap and MaleChastityNow has a lot of reviews, and they are all true. I haven't owned it for 24 hours yet, but I really like it. It has an elegantly simple design. Given my sweet spot is my frenum, it guards that perfectly. I rarely masturbate now, but I did hold my naked shaft and there just is nothing to masturbate for me. It's light at 57g / 2 oz and doesn't hurt my piercing. With Mark's expert advice, the fit is perfect.

I expect to be able to wear this consistently, hopefully even when swimming and biking.