HT2 short vs CB6000s fit

For the gearheads in the audience
ChastityNoob
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:09 pm

HT2 short vs CB6000s fit

Post by ChastityNoob »

Hey all, I'm more to the forum. My girlfriend and I have been experimenting with chastity... So far we've only used a CB6000s with OK results. I'm considering my next device and looking at the Holy Trainer short. I've seen lots of discussion about ring size, but haven't really seen much discussion with regard to cage size.

One of the issues I'm having with the CB6000s is that I feel like it's a little too long (and wide at the tip). I'm about 2.25 flaccid (measure from the bottom) and I have a half inch or so of space at my smallest. Aside from the obvious urination issues, I've had two other problems...

One is that I can orgasm pretty easily in the cage... Like really any time I want. I think it's because I have some room to grow and also because the space allows movement in the cage. I understand that chastity should be largely a mental thing, but it's so easy for me that it's barely a deterrent and it's still a good orgasm.

The second issue is that I've had pain in my shaft after getting a strong erection in the cage... Enough that sex was pretty uncomfortable after being teased for a while (and enough that I worry about injury if I continue). I suspect that this is also a result of being able to have a partial erection which strains against the cage. Does anyone else have this problem? The conventionally wisdom as I understand it is that a properly fitted cage will stop the erection before it has a chance to grow and will hopefully eliminate this problem.

This all leads to me back to my original question... Is there much difference in how the cage fits between the CB6000s and the holy trainer short? I've spent plenty of time studying the measurements, but I'm really hoping to hear from some people who've worn both and can speak to how they feel.

TLDR: CB6000s cage is too big. Looking for something a little smaller and wondering if the Holy Trainer short will provider a more snug fit.

Thanks!
User avatar
slave d
Posts: 1604
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 9:33 pm

Re: HT2 short vs CB6000s fit

Post by slave d »

It's a long time since i used either but i have used both and my memory would suggest the HT2 short was little shorter and "narrower" than the 6000S. i found it less easy to orgasm in the HT2 but there's nothing i've found that makes it impossible. i'm currently in a very small Contender and when i get worked up enough have cum in that just through the excitement of MsM cumming multiple times riding Her favourite dildo "cowgirl" with the dildo sitting just above the cage. In the end it's true that the only way to stop having orgasms totally is between your ears and i must admit, after nearly 2 years "growing" in chastity, i much prefer the incredible feelings i get being so aroused i can barely speak to the short burst of orgasm that then leaves me feeling "empty" for days.

d
New Zealand
Still having difficulty getting back into 24/7/365 chastity since covid. Very tender old man skin under the scrotum damages easily. Trying an HT Mk5 nub now. Love the fact you can’t pull out of it, hope my skin toughens up.
ChastityNoob
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:09 pm

Re: HT2 short vs CB6000s fit

Post by ChastityNoob »

My guess is that the difference isn't enough to make a significant impact with my issues...

I'm surprised there aren't more people haven't tried both of these devices since they both seem very popular. Any other input is appreciated!
Koala
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:32 pm

Re: HT2 short vs CB6000s fit

Post by Koala »

I've tried both and definitely prefer the HT2 for comfort. I believe it has much to do with the point at which it starts angling down. on the HT2, that point is actually within the circumference of the base ring or maybe a bit behind. The 6000s is beyond the ring. In my experience, the 6000s pushes away from the body whereas the HT2 tends to push down which isn't nearly as painful. That, and the HT2 seems to put more of a kink (like a hose) in the penis's full anatomy whereas the 6000s is more of a U shape.

That said, if you don't always fill the 6000s, I doubt you'd fill the HT2. the HT2 is noticeably narrower but I'd guess not enough to achieve what you're looking for.
ChastityNoob
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:09 pm

Re: HT2 short vs CB6000s fit

Post by ChastityNoob »

I think at this point I'm leaning towards biting the bullet and going for a Jail Bird. I was hesitant to drop the coin, but I feel like I'm just going to be disappointed with other off-the-shelf devices and end up there anyway, and with even less money in my bank account...

So, as a more general question for people who have experienced both a properly fitted cage and one with a little growing room, did you find it more difficult to cum in the properly fitted cage? I'm realistic and I understand the mental aspect. I'm not looking for impossible, but I'm hoping it adds some difficulty in pleasuring myself because the CB-3000s barely does anything from that standpoint... Crazy because I'm a grower and even with a little growing room I'm nowhere near full erect size.
ChastityNoob
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:09 pm

Re: HT2 short vs CB6000s fit

Post by ChastityNoob »

Bump for more answers...

Also I realized I made a mistake in my last post. I have a CB6000s, not CB3000s.

I've basically moved on from the Holy Trainer idea and I'm now considering a jailbird. Before I bite the bullet, I'm hoping to get some insight on whether I can expect a properly fitted jailbird to improve the issues I've had with the CB6000s.

Thanks!
User avatar
slave d
Posts: 1604
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 9:33 pm

Re: HT2 short vs CB6000s fit

Post by slave d »

I can't tell you about a Jailbird but MsM moved me from CB6000S to HT2 to Contender and the Contender has basically overcome all the issues with the other two. She tried a couple of cheap Chinese ones (good s/s ones that are still cheap as) to be sure the measurements were right before moving to Contender. i've been in the Contender now for over 12 months and the only mod MsM's had made is to go to a drilled out security screw with a steel seal through it.

d
New Zealand
Still having difficulty getting back into 24/7/365 chastity since covid. Very tender old man skin under the scrotum damages easily. Trying an HT Mk5 nub now. Love the fact you can’t pull out of it, hope my skin toughens up.
ChastityNoob
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:09 pm

Re: HT2 short vs CB6000s fit

Post by ChastityNoob »

slave d wrote:I can't tell you about a Jailbird but MsM moved me from CB6000S to HT2 to Contender and the Contender has basically overcome all the issues with the other two. She tried a couple of cheap Chinese ones (good s/s ones that are still cheap as) to be sure the measurements were right before moving to Contender. i've been in the Contender now for over 12 months and the only mod MsM's had made is to go to a drilled out security screw with a steel seal through it.

d
That's encouraging... Seems like the jailbird and contender are similar in terms of design/quality/function. Were your issues similar to mine or different?
User avatar
slave d
Posts: 1604
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 9:33 pm

Re: HT2 short vs CB6000s fit

Post by slave d »

If you look at my first reply you'll see, similar.

d
New Zealand
Still having difficulty getting back into 24/7/365 chastity since covid. Very tender old man skin under the scrotum damages easily. Trying an HT Mk5 nub now. Love the fact you can’t pull out of it, hope my skin toughens up.
ChastityNoob
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:09 pm

Re: HT2 short vs CB6000s fit

Post by ChastityNoob »

Ah, right... My bad.

So you said the HT was less easy to orgasm in than CB6000s... I guess it's safe to assume that you found the contender even less easy than the HT? Sorry for beating a dead horse. I'm just trying to get an idea of the relative effectiveness before plunking down the cash. I'll be pretty bummed if I spend that kind of money and it doesn't add some level of deterrance...