PA-like security, without piercing

[zoid]

I think you're all doing it wrong. Why don't you make it adapt to work with any PA piercing, then it will work with all PA devices, and you don't have to worry about the hassle and security issues of using wire to adapt to ball trap devices

[heavyrubberslave]

Why don't you make it adapt to work with any PA piercing, then it will work with all PA devices, and you don't have to worry about the hassle and security issues of using wire to adapt to ball trap devices

Well actually it's a bit different from a PA piercing. A PA piercing is behind the glans the hole of the spout which you could use like a PA piercing is after the glans so many devices using a PA piercing to add security will not fit. Because the thing which uses the PA piercing's hole to secure it is at the wrong position (to far behind).

[zorglub]

I think you're all doing it wrong

Your presumptuousness could have been offset by offering some practical insight/example of how what you propose could be achieved. In the absence of that, your suggestion is as useful as saying the space industry companies are "all doing it wrong" with that rocketry stuff, and that they should look into anti-gravity instead.
That's what is called "armchair engineering".

have to worry about the hassle and security issues of using wire to adapt to ball trap devices

Aside from the building of a custom locking wire (which could be handled by a third party if one does not have the tools/skills), I don't see what these usage "hassle" and "issues" are. If anything, on many ball trap devices, a PA fixing requires an additional lock/security-screw, which is much less convenient than the locking wires I have shown, where the ball trap's device locking mechanism secures the wire as well.

[TwistedMister]

I think you're all doing it wrong. Why don't you make it adapt to work with any PA piercing, then it will work with all PA devices, and you don't have to worry about the hassle and security issues of using wire to adapt to ball trap devices

In addition to being unable to follow directions, there seems to be an issue with reading comprehension and logical/rational thought processes.

Did you not read the thread title? What part of "without piercing" do you not understand?

The whole point is to make something for people who do not want to punch holes in their junk, and here you come, telling everyone they are "doing it wrong" and talking about making it work with a PA.

I think I'm going to go in the other room and bang my head against the brick wall. Know what the good thing is about banging your head against a brick wall? You feel so much better when you stop.

TripleFacePalm.jpg

[Tom Allen]

Know what the good thing is about banging your head against a brick wall? You feel so much better when you stop.

[zoid]

I think you're all doing it wrong. Why don't you make it adapt to work with any PA piercing, then it will work with all PA devices, and you don't have to worry about the hassle and security issues of using wire to adapt to ball trap devices

In addition to being unable to follow directions, there seems to be an issue with reading comprehension and logical/rational thought processes.

Did you not read the thread title? What part of "without piercing" do you not understand?

The whole point is to make something for people who do not want to punch holes in their junk, and here you come, telling everyone they are "doing it wrong" and talking about making it work with a PA.

I think I'm going to go in the other room and bang my head against the brick wall. Know what the good thing is about banging your head against a brick wall? You feel so much better when you stop.

TripleFacePalm.jpg

I guess i wasn't clear enough. urethral device extends out, and a metal loop is attached to the device in a way emulate the functionality of a PA piercing without having the piercing.. This way you don't have to use the wire, and it works with many devices without adaptation.

[zorglub]

I guess i wasn't clear enough. urethral device extends out, and a metal loop is attached to the device in a way emulate the functionality of a PA piercing without having the piercing.. This way you don't have to use the wire, and it works with many devices without adaptation.

I had an inkling you were thinking of something of that nature, but I could not (and still can't) fathom how someone could find that compelling...

To begin with, I'd like to understand how "a metal loop attached to the device" can be considered to satisfy the requirement that "it works with many devices without adaptation" whereas the type of wires I've depicted in this thread does not

Second, most devices that are natively designed for use with a PA (PA5000, MCN MouseTrap/GlansArmor, various PA-specific Steelworxx or Lori devices, etc) have a hook that comes up from the bottom of the device and then angles forward. Regardless of how you'd anchor the urethral device to that hook, you would not be able to push your penis into the cage beyond the back of the hook, so you'd have to wear a cage that is at least 1" longer than your size.
By the way, said PA hook could not be used to directly secure a TetherSpout: the cross-holes at the spout's tip are 3.5mm in diameter. A hook's gauge would have to be AWG 8 or thinner to even begin passing though (and given a hook's curvature you'd probably need AWG 10 to fit). Good luck finding a device with such a thin hook as they usually are AWG 4 or thicker.
And before you argue for a wire loop permanently attached to the TetherSpout to provide the needed larger anchor space for a realistic PA hook, please brush up on how a TetherSpout is installed/removed and how that added gizmo would make installation/removal acrobatic, if not impossible.

[CagedUp2015]

This is something that I'm really interested in trying as I don't think I'm at a point where I could consider getting a PA just yet. I appreciate the hard work and research that you've done with this and your willingness to share it here on the forum. I hope I can get it to work as easily as you to describe it. lol