Looker 02 problems => would shorter cage help?

[Look02]

Hi all,

I'm new to this forum and locked in a Looker 02 chastity device (65mm total length, 50mm A-ring, 38mm B-ring, detachable plug). It fits quite good, but I'm thinking about a modification. The reason is, that the penis - when flacid - will often get so small, that at the tip there's quite a lot of space around (4-5mm) and also in front of it (up to 10mm). The base of it fits the B-ring good though.

When it tries to grow in desperation, it uses the space to get powerful and the pressure can get quite high, so that at the base it pushes through the space between A- and B-rings against the lock (and of course that hurts).

I've been reading quite often that it should be best, to have the cage as small as possible. It was mentioned, that the penis shouldn't be able to get so "powerful" when trying to get erect. I could get a shorter cage, so that the penis would get clinched somewhat and would have no space to develop "power". I'm in doubt that a smaller diameter would help as at the base it's just alright. What would be your suggestion? Would a shorter cage help?

Another problem is my scrotum. Most of the time I got a real tight scrotum and it pushes hard against the cage (can get painful). If it gets warmer though, it will get much softer and hangs lower, so the cage will follow gravity Anything that can be done about it or will I just have to accept that?

[GoddessRhea]

If possible, you should get a cage that presses against the end of your penis, when flaccid. You shouldn't have growing room.

I don't have advice for the ball issue, sorry.

[Look02]

Thank you for your kind advice. It seems to be better to slightly compress the penis than to leave any extra space. The shorter cage will be even more unobtrusive, that's nice.

[ptharv]

I have a Looker 3, and I have absolutely no room for growth. I may have gone too small. My penis is compressed into my very small cage. Erections just don't happen because there is no room. I feel the start of an erection and then it ends. So many times, when stimulated, I experience a long series of starts and stops. The device has an overall length of only 60mm, penis ring is 30mm, and base ring is 38mm. As far as the ball pain, I think you are experiencing the stretching of your balls. It's usually more of a burning feeling. It gets better with time. Every time I went to a smaller base ring, I had that problem for a few weeks. Pulling the ball sack forward thru the base ring relieved it for a while, and lots of lube. Sometimes on cold winter days, I still get that burning when everything is trying to withdraw and the entire package becomes extremely tight.

[Look02]

The cage will be shortened - so that's step one. Thinking about the diameter of the cage, I don't really know: At the B-ring it seems to be just fine, but when flacid (and with the space left in front of the tip) it's getting much smaller, so there's space around the tip of it. When choosing a shorter cage in a way that the tip will be slightly compressed, it would get broader and probably just fit the width of the cage? I will have to try, as choosing a smaller diameter would not only mean a modification, but ordering a new cage altogether.

Your description regarding the balls seems to be spot on. When not wearing the cage, my ball sack is sometimes so tight, that my balls are retracting into my body as if they were not there (unfortunately not only in winter, but sometimes when they don't feel cozy and warm). Wearing the cage those times can get really hard, but hopefully it will get better over time. A smaller ring might help as my balls could hang lower, though as it is now, the root of the penis pushes very taut against the A-ring when trying to grow, so I don't think I could wear a smaller one (so hopefully a smaller cage won't let it get so powerful anymore).

[She decides]

I am in a Looker01 which is 12mm shorter than my most flaccid length, I measured several times over a couple weeks b4 I ordered.
It is very comfortable with no room for growth. The nonremovable urethral tube was painful at the tip for a few days during erections, that is all past now and there is no pain.

[Look02]

I am in a Looker01 which is 12mm shorter than my most flaccid length, I measured several times over a couple weeks b4 I ordered. It is very comfortable with no room for growth.

As I ordered the cage according to my flaccid length this maybe just the difference I would need, so I will ask to shorten the cage about 10-15mm (total length will be only 50-55m from A-Ring to tip or about 32-37mm length of the cage). Is your plug length about +10mm through the A-ring or did you choose a different length? My plug length would have to be modified too, so I'm thinking about a slightly longer version (+15mm).

The nonremovable urethral tube was painful at the tip for a few days during erections, that is all past now and there is no pain.

I got the removable plug and I had this problem too as I'm quite sensitive at the tip. I asked Steelworxx for a modded nut with rounded edges (there's one on the inside of the cage) and that helped a lot. After some usage I had no problems anymore.

[She decides]

Yeah, urethral tube is 12mm or so past the back of the A ring. I think my device is 72 mm total length from bk of A ring to tip. My penis is about 85mm at shortest flaccid. The diameter is very close to my own, maybe same size or one size up.
I wouldn't go with a longer plug myself, if anything it'd be shorter. If I ever upgrade I'll order the tube to be the same length as the A ring. Uriniating is a problem sometimes, I thinkbecause ot the length of the tube.
I'm glad my tube is not removable, for me the permanent tube locked in there is the only way to go.
I also had the ring to cage gap closed to 8mm because I ordered the anatomical bend which adds space on the bottom of the ring, I didn't want a nut to pop out. Deitmar did a great job, and my Looker01 fits perfectly.

[Look02]

Some questions regarding the shortening of my cage:

Right now the total length is about 65mm (8mm A-ring, 10mm gap and 47mm cage). The cage itself is made of the B-ring (6mm), the cap (about 20mm) and the bars (26mm on top and 12mm underneath).

When I want the cage to be shortened to about 55mm, the B-ring and the cap won't be changed, but the bars would be only 16mm on top and next to nothing underneath. What I'm thinking about:
- Should there be no bars at all underneath (no edges => no irritations possible)?
- Will it still be possible to sufficiently clean the cage without taking it off?
- Would it even look nice (long cap and those short bars)?
- Could it make sense to choose a closed version of the cage (like a steelheart but with the front part like the Looker 02) or would it be better to choose a more open version like the Looker 01 (I'm uncut, so I would have to take this into account)?

[Look02]

Just got the Looker 02 back from steelworxx - what a cute little cage (only 53mm from A-ring to tip). After calming down it went in like "nothing"

It feels good to be back in there - and it's much more unobstrusive under my trousers. Most important: My wife really likes it.