Disaster at Chez Doggy

[hot_toddy_dog]

Ah no, it happened again. Orgasm in the device. As I as pleasuring my wife last night, there was an unwanted release. I crossed the threshold from turned on to inevitable orgasm without any stimulation at all, and there wasn't anything I could do about it. Weird thing was once the inevitable state was reached, everything loosened up and I had a slow, very pleasurable and relaxed orgasm. The Inevitable -> Orgasm transition lasted about a minute, which is rather long for me.

Hopefully this won't be possible anymore with the new Steelheart. On the up side, it has been about a year since that happened last, so at least the event might be rather rare. Then again, the ability to reach orgasm from just pleasuring my wife took several years to develop, and went from next to impossible to being a regular featured attraction in just a few months.

And no, it's not a super loose fit or anything such that I jiggle around in the tube. I'm wedged, fixed in place and straining under the pressure, yet this still happens regardless.

[Tom Allen]

I guess I'm not sure why you're hoping a different device will stop this, although if you've set your goals for no orgasm whatsoever, I guess this counts as a failure.

For us, my wife found it very exciting to know that she could get me aroused enough to have an orgasm (we call it a "release") while caged, and she loves to tease me with the idea that since I've had a release, then there's no need to unlock me. Then she gets herself all hot and bothered about not unlocking me, and we continue to have some great sex.

It took a while, because they used to sneak up on me, but I've learned to tell when they are getting close; I'm required to warn her, and she will decide to keep going or to let me cool off. Usually she has me cool off, but once in a while she allows (or encourages) it.

[finallyhappy]

I'm finding that during my longer lockups that I do have some releases after getting too horny. To me it's my body letting some steam out of the pressure cooker. I don't consider it an orgasm because I receive exactly zero pleasure from it. I bring them up to my gf from time to time as my way of telling her that see my body is good for longer lockups. This is how my body handles it. But she still is going to need much more time to accept that.

[hot_toddy_dog]

I guess I'm not sure why you're hoping a different device will stop this, although if you've set your goals for no orgasm whatsoever, I guess this counts as a failure.

For us, my wife found it very exciting to know that she could get me aroused enough to have an orgasm (we call it a "release") while caged, and she loves to tease me with the idea that since I've had a release, then there's no need to unlock me. Then she gets herself all hot and bothered about not unlocking me, and we continue to have some great sex.

It took a while, because they used to sneak up on me, but I've learned to tell when they are getting close; I'm required to warn her, and she will decide to keep going or to let me cool off. Usually she has me cool off, but once in a while she allows (or encourages) it.

Well the idealistic goal is no orgasms whatsoever, the realistic goal is more like no orgasms outside the device, ever, and hopefully the ones in the device are rare. I'm hoping a new device will make releases more rare. I do find that the recovery time for getting my libido back is much shorter when I wear a chastity device, so all in all maybe this isn't a bad thing. My wife didn't mind that I was having orgasms from pleasuring her, in fact she kind of liked it. What I minded was the bottom out, irritable, dead to the idea of sex me, and if I can reduce that then there is still some benefit to a device.

Besides, my orgasms are better in the device than without. Crazy, but true. Like 10 times better.

Maybe this could be win / win.