Steelheart 2 Options

[Jedi]

My wife and I have agreed on our first steel (wow, that word makes my shiver) chastity device. Based on both of our goals and desires we decided that the Steelheart 2 from Steelworxx is it and we will be making the purchase in 2 weeks. I have looked at some of the options for the steelheart 2 and would like to hear some feedback on if they are worth the money.

• Integrated Lock - For anyone who has this, have you found it to be as reliable and secure as a traditional padlock?
• Anatomical A Ring - For those that have this option, does it improve comfort? Also, does it cause the device to be looser by increasing the distance between the lower half of the A ring and the tube?
• Stainless Steel Tube Ring - For those that have this option, does it improve comfort? Also, does it reduce the distance between the tube and A ring, or is that factored in?

I also have a questions on measurements and fit. My penis, flaccid, is about 3" from body to tip measured along the top. Is this the measurement I should use for the tube length? I know that the CB-3000 is listed as being 3" and in my flaccid state there was (too much) room. If I measure the underside of my penis, it is about 2.5" flaccid.

Thanks, in advance...

[Locked by LRC]

Not sure how Steelheart measures but, MM measures from the point where the penis and scrotum meet to the tip.

[thumper]

The integrated lock is the absolute bomb. Sleek, quiet, and totally secure. I can't imagine the SH with a regular padlock.

I don't have the anatomical ring, but have considered getting it. I have the same questions you do.

I do have the tube ring and have not worn a SH without it, so can't say it makes things better, though I do think it does. It makes the tube edge rounder and a bit thicker.

Clarify with Dietmar, but I believe he wants you to indicate the total length and then he figures out the rest. The cuff ring, the tube ring, the lock, and the tube should all add up to 3".

[thumper]

Another note about the integrated lock. Unlike a padlock, this thing is serious. I *suspect* I could break out with a flathead screwdriver, but it's made of brass and my theory might be wrong. If you lose your keys, Dietmar will not be able to send you new ones.

[Atone]

Definitely get the integrated lock. It is secure, solid, quiet, sleek. I suspect that the brass "tab" that secures the security insert could be broken off with a flat head screwdriver. It would have to be sheared flush though in order to get the insert out. Probably wouldn't be real difficult to do (in the shop) but isn't trivial either. More difficult than cutting a lock with a pair of bolt cutters for sure.

I ordered both the anatomical and standard rings with mine. They are both the same size. I am really glad I ordered both because I did not like the anatomical ring. It did not seem to be any more comfortable and because of the bend at the bottom it made the gap bigger. This caused my balls to be squeezed (a little) rather than trapped. After about three days I couldn't wear it any more. I switched to the standard ring and haven't had a problem since. I went 9 days after that, and then 14 more after that.

Somehow I managed to not see the option for the stainless steel tube ring until it was too late to add it to mine. I haven't noticed any problems not having it. If I were to order another one (like to accommodate a PA fixing) I might get it just to try it.

I'm curious why you chose the Steelheart 2 instead of the standard steelheart. It looks to me like the steelheart 2 would be difficult (maybe not possible without making a mess) to urinate with unless you are sitting down. It may be a little bit easier to clean but maybe not. I actually find that I can use the spray bottle in my steelheart and create a seal around the hole that forces water out the top. I couldn't do that with the steelheart 2.

One other thing, I am wearing a smaller ring on the steelheart than I did on the CB-3000 or any of the MM devices that I have and I wish I got it a little bit smaller. I have a 44mm ring and will probably be ordering a 42mm soon. I'm not sure what it is that allows for a smaller ring but something is. I think Thumper suggested once that it may be because the steel is a larger diameter (or maybe that is why it is more comfortable) and I think that may have something to do with it. I would suggest ordering both the size you think you need and the next size down if you can. The cost of shipping (both ways) to get a new ring fitted is only slightly less than the cost of a second ring up front. And you don't have to wait for it.

-A

[thumper]

I ordered both the anatomical and standard rings with mine. They are both the same size. I am really glad I ordered both because I did not like the anatomical ring. It did not seem to be any more comfortable and because of the bend at the bottom it made the gap bigger. This caused my balls to be squeezed (a little) rather than trapped. After about three days I couldn't wear it any more. I switched to the standard ring and haven't had a problem since.

Really glad to know that. I'll stop thinking about getting a new ring now.

I would suggest ordering both the size you think you need and the next size down if you can. The cost of shipping (both ways) to get a new ring fitted is only slightly less than the cost of a second ring up front. And you don't have to wait for it.

Fantastic advice.

[Jedi]

Definitely get the integrated lock. It is secure, solid, quiet, sleek. I suspect that the brass "tab" that secures the security insert could be broken off with a flat head screwdriver. It would have to be sheared flush though in order to get the insert out. Probably wouldn't be real difficult to do (in the shop) but isn't trivial either. More difficult than cutting a lock with a pair of bolt cutters for sure.

This is good to know. My wife REALLY likes the fact that this is that much more secure and that there isn't a lock clanking around.

I ordered both the anatomical and standard rings with mine. They are both the same size. I am really glad I ordered both because I did not like the anatomical ring. It did not seem to be any more comfortable and because of the bend at the bottom it made the gap bigger. This caused my balls to be squeezed (a little) rather than trapped. After about three days I couldn't wear it any more. I switched to the standard ring and haven't had a problem since. I went 9 days after that, and then 14 more after that.

This is VERY good to know. I think you just saved me some money! Although, I will likely spend it on an extra A ring instead.

Somehow I managed to not see the option for the stainless steel tube ring until it was too late to add it to mine. I haven't noticed any problems not having it. If I were to order another one (like to accommodate a PA fixing) I might get it just to try it.

Since I anticipate this going long term, the investment for what might be a little more comfort seems reasonable.

I'm curious why you chose the Steelheart 2 instead of the standard steelheart. It looks to me like the steelheart 2 would be difficult (maybe not possible without making a mess) to urinate with unless you are sitting down. It may be a little bit easier to clean but maybe not. I actually find that I can use the spray bottle in my steelheart and create a seal around the hole that forces water out the top. I couldn't do that with the steelheart 2.

From the pictures, it looks like the whole for urination is identical, but the SH2 also has other vents for draining. It just seemed "logical" (is anything logical about having a piece of steel locked on me to keep me constantly frustrated?) that more vents would mean more hygienic. You have made, however, a rather good point about forcing the water up through the tube for cleaning... perhaps I will reconsider the SH1.

One other thing, I am wearing a smaller ring on the steelheart than I did on the CB-3000 or any of the MM devices that I have and I wish I got it a little bit smaller. I have a 44mm ring and will probably be ordering a 42mm soon. I'm not sure what it is that allows for a smaller ring but something is. I think Thumper suggested once that it may be because the steel is a larger diameter (or maybe that is why it is more comfortable) and I think that may have something to do with it. I would suggest ordering both the size you think you need and the next size down if you can. The cost of shipping (both ways) to get a new ring fitted is only slightly less than the cost of a second ring up front. And you don't have to wait for it.

-A

When I put on the #2 ring from my CB-3000 (actually it is a CB-2000 ring), it is a little tight.... kind of on that borderline tightness where it will become an issue if I am EXTREMELY excited. I believe that this ring is 2" diameter and equivalent to the 50mm offering from Steelworxx. Perhaps I will get this size and also request something slightly larger (custom) like a 60mm ring, equivalent to a 2.36" ring. When I measure using a cloth tape (sewing tape) I come out to 2.38"... but I am wondering if it is different if I use a piece of string/cord instead of the cloth tape (due to the width of the tape). I will have to try that tonight.

Thanks Thumper and ATone and LRC for ALL of the feedback. This is no small purchase (the most I have spent on a "sex toy") and I hope to get it right the first time.

[Atone]

From the pictures, it looks like the whole for urination is identical, but the SH2 also has other vents for draining. It just seemed "logical" (is anything logical about having a piece of steel locked on me to keep me constantly frustrated?) that more vents would mean more hygienic.

On the steelheart the hole is more of a suggestion than a given. The way I urinate in it is to hold it so the hole is at the bottom and then go slow so the urine drains out of the steelheart faster than it drains out of me. If possible I then use a little bit of tissue to dry everything off at the end, if not I just let it drip for a bit. With the extra vent holes I would think that it would become unpredictable where the urine would go and would make more of a mess.

-A

[thumper]

Agreed. Also, I count on being able to create a vacuum with the one hole when I clean it. It's possible, though non-intuitive, that the extra vent would make keeping it clean more difficult. Flushing water through would definitely be problematic.

[Jedi]

OK, next question. For those that have integrated lock, can you, or the lady holding it your key, provide me with the measurements of the key? My wife is trying to figure out if it will fit into a locket. We are trying to find a nice way for her to wear it without our kids asking what it is for.