Page 1 of 1

Do you remember what your first cage was like?

Posted: Sat May 11, 2024 2:17 am
by Chastitylover48
My first cage was a transparent plastic chastity cage purchased above Lockinkhttps://www.lockink.net/products/lockin ... stity-cage.
Pros:
1. it was easy to get into and didn't require pulling the testicles inside the ring, just wrapping the ring around the testicles.
2. it's very light and breathable, doesn't really feel uncomfortable and bends at a more flattering angle to the penis.
3. Embedded lock, no need to worry about the lock and cage collision, to avoid embarrassing situations.
Disadvantages:
1. the lock can be a little loose and look like it could easily escape, but that didn't actually happen.
2. it can be hard to get an erection at night
Image

Re: Do you remember what your first cage was like?

Posted: Tue May 14, 2024 10:44 am
by mikel2411
LOL
My first device was made by me, it was six rings welded together by short rods in-between the rings with smaller ring on end with a larger ring I cut so it was hinged with tabs on the top for lock to go through. IT was awful! LOL, very functional but not sized right and couldn't be worn very long.
The first device that I bought was an original CB_3000, hinged round base ring plastic cage- immediately loved it especially when would get aroused and how it looked like canned ham was crammed in the tube. I tried to find pic of it but design has apparently changed.
PROS: Loved how it felt and once I got adjusted correctly I wore it 24/7
Fit was great
Peeing was easy (even though I didn't know that could become an issue until later with different units)
Easy to keep clean with directed spray in shower
Very enjoyable sensations and visuals when aroused
Con: Only wearable issue I had was hinge point on base ring would pinch at strange times.
Base Rings ALL of them eventually broke, last try was largest ring that was TOO big so I put tubing over it to tighten it up some and it still broke.

Mikel

Re: Do you remember what your first cage was like?

Posted: Wed May 15, 2024 8:37 pm
by Mr Pickle
The curve. Bloody stupid big thing.
Fit like a glove, endless problems at night and try hiding that thing in your pants.
The lock banging the cage when walking was like a child's drum.

Re: Do you remember what your first cage was like?

Posted: Thu May 16, 2024 12:07 am
by KnownAsHerbert
Mr Pickle wrote: Wed May 15, 2024 8:37 pm The curve. Bloody stupid big thing.
Fit like a glove, endless problems at night and try hiding that thing in your pants.
The lock banging the cage when walking was like a child's drum.
That made me smile.
A bit like my (brief) experience with the 6000S. So bulky and, yes, the lock clunking away unless held in place by certain types of underwear.

Re: Do you remember what your first cage was like?

Posted: Thu May 16, 2024 6:58 am
by WifeIsVanilla
I also made the mistake of buying the Curve as my first device, but there were pluses. I was able to experiment with different ring sizes and gaps. Also, I learned that I fit perfectly in the 1 1/2" inside diameter of the tube. Most devices have an ID of 1 3/8" and the eighth of an inch makes a big difference for me. Additionally, it brought to my attention that the length of the tube / cage is only part of the length of the entire device which includes the gap plus the width of the base ring.

The Curve is long enough to allow partial nocturnal erections which are forced downward by the shape of the tube. This is a very different sensation than with a properly fitting device which stops erections before they really get started. Some masochistic part enjoys my erections being forced downward so I still have a Curve that I occasionally sleep in.

Upon reflection, I think there were more pluses than minuses having the Curve as a first device. After all, what are the odds of getting a perfect device on the first try?

Re: Do you remember what your first cage was like?

Posted: Tue May 21, 2024 2:21 am
by KHEmmi
I would agree with the benefit of being able to try multiple combinations of ring and spacer sizes.
That's what we did with our brief trial of the CB6000S.
No going back to that but the experiments were useful.