Page 1 of 2
Fabric instead of hardware
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 11:12 pm
by J Random reader
In
Do people know
Atone wrote:J Random reader wrote:Would a *truly* chaste man need hardware?
I tuck.
Fabric instead of hardware.
That is pretty cool and I don't even know what it means. It just sounds cool. Do you mind explaining how this works?
Please excuse my ignorance but is this a cross dressing / feminization thing? The only time I have heard of this that was the context.
Thanks. It works well enough.
The first step is the hardest. Gently press your testes up into your inguinal canals.
Fold the scrotum flat. Pull your penis back between your legs. Wear something that will hold everything in place. I find something like unisex bike shorts work. Anything nylon and spandex.
It can be a cross dressing / feminization thing. Or cosplay:
How to tuck is a good explanation. Followed by a really long, long running thread. Imagine that!
But it's none of those for us. For me it's about being denied my penis. Maybe nullification. Nothing to see here, move along. So I wonder about that getting noticed. & it's like phantom limb. There and not there at the same time. I cannot get truly erect. Swollen at best. After being teased, being tucked back away is deflating. That fits in with teasing and denial. Leastways for us. I wonder that I'm the first to mention?
I hope that explains how it works. If not, ask away.
Re: Fabric instead of hardware
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 12:17 am
by tradinator
Does that work long term? What about temperature control?
Re: Fabric instead of hardware
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:33 am
by Locked by LRC
Do you hang low or are you tight? I would think if you hang low it would be harder, you would have extra skin to deal with.
Re: Fabric instead of hardware
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 7:47 am
by Atone
J Random reader wrote:
It can be a cross dressing / feminization thing. Or cosplay:
How to tuck is a good explanation.
But it's none of those for us. For me it's about being denied my penis. Maybe nullification.
Thanks for the explanation and the link, a whole new world to explore. Now I wish I was unlocked for a bit so I could experiment a little.
Re: Fabric instead of hardware
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:09 am
by mrtiny
I have done this before, but appreciated the link - I did it with extrememly tight underwear today for fun. Worked very well. Will also consider taping.
For me, this is a different thing than chastity. I'm into denial, control, and humiliation (and a lot of other stuff . . . ) Tucking like this is extrememly humiliating for me; both in the sense of feeling like a nullo, by doing it to erase my bulge and negate my masculinity by recreating a pre-pubescent state; and also in the sense of being forced into a feminized role, by doing this to look better in panties, etc.
For me, chastity can be also used to make me feel like a nullo - prevents erections and orgasm, nullifies my sexuality - but more often, I feel like it just makes me subservient to the Dom's desires. Whatever I do with or for him, I am not allowed to experience gratification, and must remain subordinate to his will. I will definitely be turned on, and constantly, but can't reap the typical rewards of the turn-on.
These are definitely related things, but I enjoy the nuanced differences between them.
Re: Fabric instead of hardware
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:01 pm
by J Random reader
tradinator, It works long term. I've been doing this for years. Always when awake, except for church. Almost always when asleep unless I get left out after play time. Temperature control? They're never cold!
How would I tell if they're too warm?
Locked, I guess I hang low. Isn't that kind of a personal question? Oh wait... Forgot where I was. The extra skin can untuck in underwear. If I'm not wearing bike shorts. & that can be a problem.
I adjust during trips to the mens room.
Atone, follow up when you get to experiment. The year is still young. You'll be unlocked. Eventually.
I tried a couple of dance belts. Those gave me the idea to begin with. I got one for some athletic training some time ago. OK but $. I noticed that some "gaffs" were rebranded panties. I showed the misses those on some websites. She reminisced about girdles!
& we brainstormed what could work & at retail prices. Mens underwear with no room in the fly. Now I'll take smaller underwear. Smallest size I can wear. Briefs or "bikini" or thong style work. I fold up the loose material in a Z along the narrow part. & I sew up the slack along the stitch work. Or thong style -- stitched up at a right angle. TMI?
mrtiny, thanks for speaking up. Glad to know it's not just me. Tucking does erase the bulge. Maybe too well. I wonder who notices? So I prefer dark pants. I've tried taping. Mixed results. Hard to fix when it needs fixing. But I think the misses liked it. I should try again. Being tucked & to feel aroused & erect. & then to feel her hand there in the void. It's a mind trip
Re: Fabric instead of hardware
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:18 pm
by Atone
J Random reader wrote:Atone, follow up when you get to experiment. The year is still young. You'll be unlocked. Eventually.
you would think that but not necessarily
Thanks for the reminder about this, I will be unlocked in a month or so due to an international trip by air. I will not be free to orgasm or "play" but I could try this experiment. I will be out of country for 5 days and should have plenty of time.
Re: Fabric instead of hardware
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:47 pm
by J Random reader
Atone wrote:I will be unlocked in a month or so due to an international trip by air. I will not be free to orgasm or "play" but I could try this experiment.
Well, OK. But if you get held up after the body scanner, don't blame me.
I swear, after the scan -- there seems to be this small wait. Maybe their just checking -- that they matched the scan & the person? Then they let me through.
Re: Fabric instead of hardware
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 6:44 am
by Atone
J Random reader wrote:
Well, OK. But if you get held up after the body scanner, don't blame me.
I swear, after the scan -- there seems to be this small wait. Maybe their just checking -- that they matched the scan & the person? Then they let me through.
I already thought about that, I would probably wait until I got there. Plus I won't be unlocked until I am on the way out the door to the airport, that is our usual MO for when I have to be unlocked for an event.
Re: Fabric instead of hardware
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:09 pm
by locked4her55
Atone wrote:J Random reader wrote:
Well, OK. But if you get held up after the body scanner, don't blame me.
I swear, after the scan -- there seems to be this small wait. Maybe their just checking -- that they matched the scan & the person? Then they let me through.
I already thought about that, I would probably wait until I got there. Plus I won't be unlocked until I am on the way out the door to the airport, that is our usual MO for when I have to be unlocked for an event.
Ok, I have heard it stated many times that once you've gone metal you never go back to plastic
Since my Jailbird hasen't arrived yet and have no knowledge of how much better it's going to be. Why tho would I not use my old CB6000s with plastic locks for those times I am flying? In the past I've passed thru very strict, full body scan Logan Airport in Boston without a problem.